Zhang Hegang

Partner

share

You can scan the QR code or copy the link to share

copy Link
Zhang Hegang

Zhang Hegang

Partner

Telephone:

8610-50953808

E-mail:

Zhanghegang@bj-huixiang.com.cn

Location:

Beijing

Language:

Chinese

Zhang Hegang

Personal Profile


Representative Performance


Honorary Awards


academic achievement


Social duties


Zhang Hegang

Zhang Hegang

Partner

Telephone:

8610-50953808

Location:

Beijing

Language:

Chinese

Areas of Expertise

Administrative Disputes and Relief,Litigation, Arbitration and Enforcement,Government and Public Policy,Market supervision,Marriage and Family Affairs and Wealth Inheritance

Personal Profile

  • He is currently the senior equity partner of Beijing Huixiang Law Firm, the director of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Professional Committee of Beijing Huixiang Law Firm, the interview and assessment officer of the Beijing Lawyers Association, and the deputy secretary of the Administrative and Government Legal Advisory Business Research Association of Beijing Chaoyang District Lawyers Association, Mediator of Beijing Diversified Mediation Development Promotion Association.
    Graduated from Peking University, proficient in administrative law, administrative procedure law and administrative reconsideration law. Since practicing as a lawyer in 2007, he has been committed to the legal practice research of real estate expropriation and recovery, administrative punishment, administrative agreement, administrative supervision and other leading cities. Based on the enterprise's expropriation and demolition, real estate recovery, administrative punishment, environmental protection shutdown and administrative supervision compliance review.
    A well-known "legal self-media" person in the administrative law industry, the WeChat public number "Administrative Law Related Research" founded and operated by him has attracted nearly 120000 people.

Representative Performance

  • Dali butterfly Haiyue Hotel Management Co., Ltd. and others refused to accept the Dali Municipal People's government to suspend business within a time limit. In the second instance, they rejected the lawsuit because they did not meet the conditions for prosecution, and applied to the Supreme People's court for retrial. The Supreme People's court ordered the Yunnan Higher People's court to retrial
  • Fuzhou Kangji Food Co., Ltd. sued the People's Government of Changle District, Fuzhou City for compulsory demolition and administrative compensation. The Putian Intermediate People's Court rejected the lawsuit on the grounds that it did not meet the conditions for the lawsuit, and appealed to the Fujian Higher People's Court, and the Fujian Higher People's Court revoked the first instance ruling Orders the Putian Intermediate People's Court to continue the trial
  • Fu Mou, Guangshan County, Xinyang City, and other four people refused to accept the land recovery approval case of the people's Government of Guangshan County, Xinyang City. The court of first instance rejected the claim and appealed to the Henan Higher People's Court. The Henan Higher People's Court ruled that the land recovery approval was illegal; Later, the People's Government of Guangshan County, Xinyang City applied to the Supreme People's Court for a retrial, and the Supreme People's Court rejected the retrial application
  • Shandong Runhua Property Management Co., Ltd. refused to accept the approval of the Beijing Chaoyang District People's Government for production safety accidents. Due to serious violations of the approval procedures, the Chaoyang District People's Government took the initiative to reach a settlement with Shandong Runhua Property Management Co., Ltd. in the process of the first instance. Runhua Property Management Co., Ltd. withdrew the lawsuit
  • An accounting firm in Beijing is not satisfied with the administrative penalty case to be 6 million by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the agent participates in the hearing. After the hearing, the China Securities Regulatory Commission has not punished an accounting firm in Beijing.
  • Urumqi City Hu refused to accept the house expropriation decision of the people's Government of Urumqi New City District, and the court of first instance ruled that the house expropriation decision was illegal.
  • Gaomi City Du Mou because Gaomi City Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau made a deadline for demolition, forced demolition without compensation case, Gaomi City People's Court revoked the deadline for demolition, forced demolition, and then filed a national compensation lawsuit, Weifang City Fangzi District People's Court ruled Gaomi City Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau compensation 1.25 million
  • Pingdingshan City Zhai and other 6 people refused to accept the housing expropriation compensation decision of the People's Government of Xinhua District, Pingdingshan City, and the court of first instance ruled to revoke the housing expropriation compensation decision; the People's Government of Xinhua District made a housing expropriation compensation decision on Zhai and other 6 people four times, and four houses The expropriation compensation decisions were revoked by the people's court
  • Cui Mou, Mentougou District, Beijing, refused to accept the house expropriation compensation decision made by the People's Government of Mentougou District, Beijing, and the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court revoked the house expropriation compensation decision in the first instance; the People's Government of Mentougou District appealed to the Beijing Higher People's Court, Beijing The Higher People's Court rejected the appeal
  • Fuyang City Hu and other three people refused to accept the Fuyang Municipal People's Government's land recovery decision. Because the decision did not follow the principle of due process before making the decision, the court of first instance confirmed that the land recovery decision was illegal; the Fuyang Municipal People's Government refused to accept the first instance judgment and filed an appeal, and the second instance court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.

Honorary Awards

academic achievement

Social duties

Zhang Hegang

Zhang Hegang

Partner of law firm, director of administrative dispute resolution professional committee

Contact a lawyer

We will contact you within one working day. Please pay attention to your email.

Submission

Press recommend