Kui Zhuoran

criminal defense

The "Louhe Special Triad Gang" in Jinzhou City, Liaoning Province, represented the first defendant Lou of the gang involved in the gang;
The corruption and abuse of power case of Geng, former deputy mayor of Baoshan City, Yunnan Province;
In Lvliang City, Shanxi Province, a major case of opening a casino on an overseas network occurred. Wei was arrested for the crime of opening a casino. During the review and prosecution stage, he submitted insufficient evidence to the procuratorial organs and was accepted. The charge was changed to assisting in information network criminal activities, and the serious crime was changed to pleading guilty. The sentence was increased from the original more than ten years' imprisonment to one year and six months' imprisonment;
In Ordos City, Inner Mongolia, Li illegally occupied agricultural land and engaged in illegal mining. Li was arrested for illegal mining, and during the review and prosecution stage, he submitted a review opinion on the necessity of detention to the procuratorial organs, which was adopted. Li was released on bail on the last day. During the court trial stage, with two charges against him, the lawyer organized experts to argue and submitted favorable evidence, ultimately helping Li obtain probation;
In Xianning City, Hubei Province, the contract fraud case of Li's gang involved an amount of about 100 million yuan, which was audited. Li pleaded guilty and accepted punishment at the procuratorate stage. After fine tuned work by lawyers and submission of corresponding defense opinions, Li was sentenced to the lowest level of imprisonment (ten years in prison) according to the Criminal Law, and another accomplice of the gang was finally granted probation.

Non prosecution or non approval of arrest cases

Jiang, a senior executive of a real estate company, is suspected of intentional injury and has successfully not been prosecuted. The defense opinion of the case was recognized by the prosecutor's office, and the prosecutor's office made a decision not to prosecute, which stabilized the company's stock price and also saved the individual's career;
A senior executive of a state-owned enterprise, Zhou (Deputy Bureau), was suspected of provoking trouble and was successfully not prosecuted. Drunk and injuring pedestrians, counseling family members to reach a settlement with all victims, successfully applying for bail pending trial during the public security stage, obtaining legal opinions and recognition after communication with the prosecution, promoting the prosecutor's office to visit and investigate Zhou's unit, and the prosecutor's office made a decision not to prosecute him;
Jin, a senior executive of a listed company, was suspected of illegally misappropriating funds and was successfully not prosecuted. Internal factional struggles within the company led to being investigated and detained by local public security. After the intervention of lawyers, key evidence and logical loopholes in the case were discovered and submitted to the prosecutor's office. However, the prosecutor's office raised doubts and did not prosecute him;
Guo was suspected of falsely issuing value-added tax special invoices. After being prosecuted by the prosecutor's office, he was successfully not arrested and released on bail pending trial. Guo was arrested and fled online due to additional charges by the prosecutor's office. After accepting the commission, the lawyer promptly met with the client and discovered significant flaws in the evidence. During the review and approval stage, the interview transcript was submitted to the prosecutor's office along with the defense opinion that the arrest was not approved. The prosecutor's office made a decision not to approve the arrest due to insufficient evidence. Guo was criminally detained for 37 days and successfully released on bail pending trial;
Feng was suspected of falsely issuing value-added tax special invoices and was successfully released on bail pending trial without being arrested. At the beginning of the case, it was learned from the family that if the tax amount involved is over 500000 yuan, the criminal law stipulates a sentence of more than three years in prison and there is no possibility of bail. After multiple meetings with the lawyer, it was found that Feng obtained the relevant invoices in good faith, which should be an innocent case. The lawyer promptly fixed the evidence, grasped the main contradiction, formed a defense strategy, and submitted relevant evidence and defense opinions on not approving the arrest to the prosecutor's office during the review and approval stage, which was affirmed by the investigating prosecutor. Finally, the decision was made not to approve the arrest of Feng due to insufficient evidence;
Tao was suspected of fraud and was successfully not prosecuted. During the review and prosecution stage, significant flaws were discovered in the case handling process and main evidence through reviewing the case files. Defense opinions were communicated with the prosecution in advance, and the procuratorate made a decision not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence;
Yang is suspected of fraud and has successfully not been prosecuted. Qin was detained for fraud on the basis of a "routine loan gang" project. After accepting the commission, he met with Yang several times and found that he did not have the subjective intention to illegally occupy others' property. Although he was closely connected with the "routine loan gang", he had no criminal facts and did not participate in gang activities, so he should not continue to be detained as a suspect. After submitting a legal opinion on the necessity of detention during the investigation stage, Yang was recognized and released on bail pending trial. In the later stage of review and prosecution, after submitting a legal opinion not to prosecute, it was recognized and supported, and ultimately Yang successfully did not prosecute;
Cheng is suspected of theft and has successfully not been prosecuted. The defense opinions during the investigation stage were recognized by the prosecution and the arrest was not approved. During the review and prosecution stage, the prosecutor's office notified Cheng by phone to prepare for prosecution. After reviewing the main evidence of the curly hair case and fully communicating with the prosecutor's office, the legal opinion was recognized by the prosecutor and a decision not to prosecute was made the next day;
Zhang is suspected of theft and has successfully not been prosecuted. Zhang was criminally detained on suspicion of burglary. After accepting the commission, it was discovered that there were significant flaws in the evidence. After submitting a legal opinion to the prosecutor's office not to approve the arrest, it was recognized and a decision was made not to approve the arrest due to insufficient evidence. Later, Zhang was not prosecuted;
Luo was suspected of rape and was successfully not arrested. Luo was keeping a mistress outside and had a conflict of interest with her. After a sexual encounter, she was accused of rape and criminally detained by the public security bureau. In the early stage of investigation, by meeting with the parties involved for criminal counseling, sorting out factual evidence, visiting insiders, etc., evidence is submitted to the procuratorate, and the procuratorate makes a decision not to approve their arrest;
 

Non prosecution or non approval of arrest cases

An Internet giant helped the company successfully file a lawsuit in Shanghai because its employees were suspected of accepting bribes from non state employees (the company's first case of employee bribery, which was arrested with zero confession);
An Internet company helped the company successfully file a case in Fujian because its employees were suspected of the crime of job embezzlement (the case involved more than one person in three places, and the police in three places coordinated the handling of the case);
A listed real estate company helped its employees successfully file a lawsuit in Nanjing on suspicion of embezzlement (cleverly setting up traps and embezzling tens of millions of yuan from the company's property sales);
A listed gaming company has successfully filed a lawsuit in Beijing for its employees suspected of illegally obtaining computer information systems (stealing core game data);
A Hong Kong listed company, whose business reputation was damaged due to being fabricated and spread false facts by competitors, helped the company successfully file a lawsuit in Beijing for the crime of damaging its business reputation;
A real estate company helped its employees successfully file a lawsuit in Beijing for the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data (purchasing web crawler software online to steal company real estate data);

 

Brand Star in Dispute Resolution of 2024: Ingenuity Lawyers

Deputy Director of the Criminal Professional Committee of Chaoyang District Lawyers Association

Legal Daily Lawyer Expert Database Expert

Chief Legal Advisor of the Capital Cultural and Sports Exchange Public Welfare Foundation

Chief Legal Advisor of the 5th China International Import Expo International Cultural Exchange Forum